Skip to navigation Skip to main content

Technical and statistical information

Filename
understanding-school-profile-page-2024.pdf
Size
195 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
interpreting-financial-data-2024.pdf
Size
139 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
guide-to-understanding-icsea-values-2024.pdf
Size
535 KB
Format
application/pdf

The ICSEA and SEA quarters calculation model is subject to a process of continuous refinement and enhancement. The latest model and procedures are explained in full details in the Technical report 2019 – Approach to reporting on My School.


Filename
icsea_2024_technical_report.pdf
Size
696 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
icsea_2023_technical_report.pdf
Size
697 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
icsea_2022_technical_report.pdf
Size
809 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
icsea_2021_technical_report.pdf
Size
424 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
techncial-report-2019-approach-to-reporting-on-my-school.pdf
Size
2 MB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
icsea_2018_technical_report.pdf
Size
417 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
icsea_2017_technical_report.pdf
Size
347 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
icsea_2016_technical_report.pdf
Size
344 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
icsea_2015_technical_report.pdf
Size
311 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
icsea_2014_technical_report.pdf
Size
428 KB
Format
application/pdf

ICSEA 2013
Filename
icsea_2013_generation_report.pdf
Size
876 KB
Format
application/pdf

The NAPLAN average score is an estimate of a school’s performance based on the students who were tested in the school. This estimate is more accurate when the number of students tested is large and when the students perform at a similar level. Standard errors reflect the accuracy of the estimate and the degree of confidence one can have in the estimate.

The PDF documents below provide indicative standard errors of NAPLAN school performance scores for the average with different numbers of tested students. They provide an indication of the standard error margin for a school. These are used to derive the margin of error that is shown on the graphical depiction of NAPLAN results.

An indicative error is an estimated error associated with a number of students in a school's test group. The prediction is derived by regressing standard errors on a number of students in a test group.

'Resampled data with replacement' means that the same number of student records is sampled each time, except that the same student record may be sampled more than once. With more than 1,000 replications, this produces a highly accurate estimate of the standard error.

That bootstrapped standard error is then modelled, as was the standard error of the average, and the predicted values from that modelling are the indicative errors.


Filename
year-3-average-indicative-standard-error.pdf
Size
110 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
year-5-average-indicative-standard-error.pdf
Size
110 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
year-7-average-indicative-standard-error.pdf
Size
110 KB
Format
application/pdf

Filename
year-9-average-indicative-standard-error.pdf
Size
110 KB
Format
application/pdf

In some instances, data fields may vary in their treatment across states and territories. Where appropriate, caveats are collected to accompany data submissions so that how jurisdictions treat data fields can be captured and reported. Please follow links below to see where these are.

Caveats for school attendance

Caveats for senior secondary outcomes

Caveats for VET in schools

Caveats for Finance (Financial limitations)

When jurisdictions report financial information, data fields can vary in their treatment across states, territories and school sectors. Therefore, financial limitations are also collected to accompany financial data submissions so that these differences can be captured and reported. See financial limitations for all jurisdictions 2014–2022.

At the end of each year's finance data collection, ACARA releases a financial data reporting methodology report, and an independent contractor releases a letter of accounting advice and an independent assurance practitioners compliance report. Up until 2018, this was Deloitte and from 2019, this is PricewaterhouseCoopers. See financial reports and letters for 2014-2022.